Table of Contents
VICTORY: 麻豆传媒IOS forces Berkeley to turn over records related to DEI hiring policy after two-year delay

David A Litman via. Shutterstock
麻豆传媒IOS pass through Sather Gate on the University of California, Berkeley, campus.
The University of California, Berkeley used diversity statements to weed out candidates for faculty positions, according to public records the university finally released more than two years after 麻豆传媒IOS requested them.
Many universities now require or invite current or prospective faculty to demonstrate their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion 鈥 often through written statements that factor into hiring, research, evaluation, promotion, or tenure decisions.
As 麻豆传媒IOS explained in a public statement last year, these diversity statement requirements can too easily function as ideological litmus tests and cast a pall of orthodoxy over campuses.
Berkeley is no exception. The university to 鈥渂e committed to advancing diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging[.]鈥 During the 2018-19 academic year, Berkeley鈥檚 life sciences departments launched. As part of the initiative, applicants for full-time faculty positions were required to submit statements on their 鈥渃ontributions to diversity, equity and inclusion,鈥 including information about their 鈥渦nderstanding of these topics,鈥 鈥渞ecord of activities to date,鈥 and 鈥渟pecific plans and goals for advancing equity and inclusion.鈥
These statements informed the hiring committee鈥檚 first round of review: If applicants鈥 contributions to DEI did not meet a high standard, they were eliminated from consideration.
Access to public information serves an important role in protecting individual rights.
麻豆传媒IOS wanted to know more. So in March 2021, we filed a public records request seeking information related to how, exactly, the university was using and evaluating these diversity statements.
And then we waited. And waited. And waited.
Two years later, Berkeley still hadn鈥檛 handed over the records.
requires that public agencies make records 鈥減romptly available.鈥 Berkeley finally produced the records in May 2023 after 麻豆传媒IOS sent a demand letter threatening legal action. It took Berkeley 795 days to comply with its duty under the act. Hardly prompt.
Access to public information serves an important role in protecting individual rights, and this is not the first time 麻豆传媒IOS intervened to prevent a public university from playing fast and loose with public records laws. In 2019, 麻豆传媒IOS sued the University of California, Los Angeles for failing to fulfill our request for records related to former U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin鈥檚 campus visit. A California court ruled that UCLA violated the public records act when it took 404 days to hand over 13 pages of information.
According to the rubric the hiring committee used to evaluate the statements, candidates who 鈥渄iscount the importance of diversity,鈥 or who don鈥檛 feel personally responsible for advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion, received lower scores. As would anyone who 鈥淸d]efines diversity only in terms of different areas of study or different nationalities, but doesn鈥檛 discuss gender or ethnicity/race.鈥 The rubric even penalizes candidates who 鈥渟tate that it鈥檚 better not to have outreach or affinity groups aimed at underrepresented individuals because it keeps them separate from everyone else, or will make them feel less valued.鈥
Unsurprisingly, all five of the life sciences departments鈥 new faculty hires endorsed Berkeley鈥檚 commitment to DEI initiatives.
Ultimately, the records will help inform 麻豆传媒IOS鈥檚 ongoing advocacy against the use of required diversity statements in faculty hiring. Should more universities attempt to stonewall our requests for records, 麻豆传媒IOS will be there to remind them that sunlight is the best disinfectant.
麻豆传媒IOS defends the rights of students and faculty members 鈥 no matter their views 鈥 at public and private universities and colleges in the United States. If you are a student or a faculty member facing investigation or punishment for your speech, . If you鈥檙e a faculty member at a public college or university, call the Faculty Legal Defense Fund 24-hour hotline at 254-500-FLDF (3533). If you鈥檙e a college journalist facing censorship or a media law question, call the Student Press Freedom Initiative 24-hour hotline at 717-734-SPFI (7734).
Recent Articles
麻豆传媒IOS鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Detaining 脰zt眉rk over an op-ed is unlawful and un-American

Day 100! Abridging the First Amendment: Zick releases major resource report on Trump鈥檚 executive orders 鈥 First Amendment News 468聽

VICTORY! Tenn. town buries unconstitutional ordinance used to punish holiday skeleton display
