�鶹��ýIOS

“I had a sniper gun pointed at me when trying to defend a protest that was in compliance with school policies.”

 TAKE ACTION

The student who wrote that line in �鶹��ýIOS’s  wasn’t using a metaphor. They were describing a spring afternoon in 2024 at Indiana University’s Dunn Meadow — a campus green with a lineage of protest dating to the  “shantytowns” of the 1980s — when officers with rifles took positions on the roof of the Indiana Memorial Union over the heads of student protesters. Indiana State Police  they had positioned officers “with sniper capabilities” on rooftops.

The night before, administrators had convened an ad hoc meeting that rewrote IU’s Outdoor Spaces policy to require approval for structures that had long been permitted. By morning, a peaceful protest was recast as a policy violation. By noon, state police had taken a “” above the lawn. 

Police arrested dozens of students and faculty over two days, and many received one‑year campus bans later . Ultimately, the Monroe County Prosecutor’s office dropped the “” charges. �鶹��ýIOS wrote IU leadership objecting to the eleventh‑hour policy change and the resulting crackdown, warning IU that manipulating rules to curtail disfavored protest is incompatible with a public university’s First Amendment obligations.

For a university whose motto celebrates “,” the optics were unmissable: IU had turned its own tradition of protest into grounds for punishment. Unfortunately, it wasn’t an isolated incident, but a warning for what would follow.

Act now: Condemn Indiana University’s censorship of student media

Indiana University fired its student media adviser for refusing to censor the student paper, then banned the paper’s print edition.

Read More

The atmosphere that spring clarified what faculty had been saying in whispered discontent : academic freedom and shared governance were being treated as obstacles to be managed. On April 16, 2024, nearly 1,000 faculty came together for an unprecedented meeting where  of those present voted no confidence in IU’s leadership. At the time, �鶹��ýIOS noted that the no‑confidence movement explicitly  encroachments on academic freedom and viewpoint discrimination concerns.

One flashpoint was the university’s handling of associate professor Abdulkader Sinno,  from teaching and advising in December 2023 after a dispute over a room reservation — the registered student group he had advised being none other than the Palestine Solidarity Committee. �鶹��ýIOS went on record with a reminder that public universities must not punish faculty for facilitating student expression or for the viewpoints associated with that expression.

Another flashpoint was art. In December 2023, IU’s Eskenazi Museum abruptly  a long‑planned retrospective of Palestinian‑American painter Samia Halaby, notifying the artist her work would no longer be shown in a terse letter curtailing three years of preparation. IU invoked concerns about security and the “.” But as �鶹��ýIOS explained, public institutions cannot cancel art because the artist’s politics are unpopular or because controversy is inconvenient. 

Meanwhile, cancellations migrated into other corners of campus life. In January 2025, the IU School of Medicine canceled its LGBTQ+ Health Care Conference, initially offering only a  on the website. Administrators later cited  as the reason. One invited keynote speaker, journalist Chris Geidner, publicly confirmed the cancellation. As �鶹��ýIOS frequently reminds universities, preemptively shutting down academic programming due to political headwinds chills debate and undermines academic freedom. Universities exist to give ideas a platform, not to turn them away.

IU’s Israel-Palestine-related cancellations didn’t run in only one political direction, either. In March 2024, IU officials  IU Hillel to postpone an event with Mosab Hassan Yousef, a prominent pro‑Israel activist and Hamas critic, citing security threats. Instead of securing the event, IU “postponed” it, but apparently never rescheduled.

By the publication of �鶹��ýIOS’s 2026 , the numbers matched the mood. Indiana University ranked 255th out of 257 institutions surveyed, making it the worst‑ranked public university in America, with bottom‑tier scores in openness, administrative support, and comfort expressing ideas. Roughly  IU students reported discipline or threats of discipline for their expression, and nearly �ٳ�����‑q�ܲ����ٱ���� of faculty said the administration does not protect academic freedom. 

This fall, IU’s crackdown reached the newsroom. Student editors at the Indiana Daily Student ran two straightforward, newsworthy pieces: one on IU’s suspension of the Palestine Solidarity Committee, another on IU’s abysmal free‑speech ranking. �鶹��ýIOS  Media School Dean David Tolchinsky pressed them to suppress the coverage. When they refused, the university ordered the paper’s print edition  just before homecoming. 

Control at an editorially independent student paper belongs to the students, not to administrators.

When Jim Rodenbush, the director of student media, declined to enforce content restrictions, he was . �鶹��ýIOS’s Student Press Freedom Initiative immediately wrote IU on Oct. 16, condemning the firing as apparent retaliation and the print‑ban directive as unconstitutional censorship by a public university. The students’ response captured the stakes: an image of an empty newspaper rack on campus captioned with a single word in block letters, “.”

IU has since  the print shutdown amid national outcry and a federal  filed by Rodenbush. The chancellor has authorized IDS to print through June 30, 2026, within budget parameters. �鶹��ýIOS’s position remains: Control at an editorially independent student paper belongs to the students, not to administrators.

Seen together — the midnight rule change at Dunn Meadow, the snipers on the roof, the faculty’s 93% vote of no confidence, the sanctioning of a professor for defending a student group’s right to meet, the cancellation of an artist’s exhibit, the quiet erasure of a healthcare conference, the postponement of a controversial speaker under the elastic banner of security, and finally the order to stop the presses — it is clear Indiana University has a crisis on its hands. This is a campus where students practice self‑silencing to survive the semester, where faculty measure every sentence against the week’s political weather, where the oxygen of inquiry thins until only the safest words remain.

Today — Monday, Nov. 10 — �鶹��ýIOS answers in one forum the university can’t control: the public square. Our first billboard went up in Bloomington this morning. It’s stark — black, white, and �鶹��ýIOS red — and it names the problem plainly, pointing readers to see the record for themselves. 

IU has a chance here to do the right thing, but if they don’t, more boards will follow, put up in places where IU’s leaders, alumni, and visitors will pass them on their way to games and meetings and flights. The point is not spectacle but accountability: to hold a mirror up to a public university that has tried, repeatedly, to dodge the image it has made for itself.

�鶹��ýIOS doesn’t launch campaigns like this to score points. We’re launching this campaign because IU, a taxpayer‑funded institution, has betrayed its public duty, believing it doesn’t need to answer to the Constitution or the consequences of ignoring the First Amendment. 

Any university that posts sharpshooters over a peaceful protest, cancels art for its connotations, shutters a conference because of its politics, and then turns around and tells student journalists they can’t print the truth about any one of these stories hasn’t merely lost its way. It has chosen a different map — one that trades the honest noise of debate for the chilling silence of control. That’s not how we do things in America. 

What the hell is going on at Indiana University?

Indiana University just banned its student paper for reporting its awful free speech ranking. You literally can’t make this up.

Read More

The rifles are gone from the roof now, but the memory of their presence is as much a part of Dunn Meadow as the grass. The empty newspaper racks may soon be refilled, but national headlines about a campus with no newspaper endure like a warning label.

Indiana University’s leaders have a choice to make.

They can continue to censor and pretend it’s not a problem. Or, they can acknowledge what these last 20 months have made obvious and begin to repair what fear has fractured. They can ensure student and faculty speech is not micromanaged, that journalists report without preclearance, that art hangs because it is art, and that a university’s purpose is not to avoid controversy but to teach, especially when the debate is loud and the issue is of great public importance.

We’re calling on IU to issue a public statement acknowledging its violations of students’ and faculty members’ free speech rights and to meet with �鶹��ýIOS’s experts to begin improving its ranking. Reinstating Rodenbush would also be a meaningful first step in demonstrating that IU is serious about addressing its free speech problems.

Until then, we’ll keep telling this story where it cannot be edited away — on screens, on pages, and, starting today, on the unmissable canvases that rise beside Indiana’s roads.