Table of Contents
Washington State University Continues Campaign of Repression

Ian Dewar Photography / Shutterstock.com
PULLMAN, Wash., Oct. 12, 2005āIn recent months, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS) has intervened twice at Washington State University to protect studentsā freedom of expression. After publicly proclaiming respect for their studentsā rights, Washington State administrators have now made clear that, between their grading students on their politics and their paying for hecklers to disrupt student plays, liberty is still in dire straits in Pullman.
āThe latest developments at Washington State are quite revealing,ā remarked Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS President David French. āAfter the administration twice refused to apologize for subsidizing disruptive hecklers and refused to guarantee that it wouldnāt do so again, the dean of education suggested that Justice Antonin Scaliaās beliefs might disqualify him from earning a teaching degree from Washington State.ā
This fall Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS defended the rights of 42-year-old education student Ed Swan, a self-described conservative Christian. Swan was given poor marks on ādispositionsā criteria used by Washington Stateās College of Education for expressing beliefs such as the idea that white privilege and male privilege do not exist. āDispositionsā criteria, used to evaluate studentsā commitment to ideological concepts such as āsocial justice,ā sensitivity to ācommunity and cultural norms,ā and āothersā varied talents and perspectives,ā are used nationwide in education programs and can often jeopardize studentsā First Amendment rights.
Before Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS intervened in this case, Washington State threatened Swan with dismissal if he did not sign an unconstitutional contract obliging him to submit to even more ideological litmus tests. Upon receiving Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās letter, the university dropped the contract and pledged to Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS that it would no longer use its ādispositionsā criteria in an unconstitutional manner.
Yet in , Washington State Dean of Education Judy Mitchell revealed the College of Educationās chilling disregard for the First Amendment. When Peters asked Mitchell if conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia could pass the ādispositionsā criteria, Mitchell replied, āI donāt know how to answer that.ā She continued, āI havenāt been in on faculty discussions of how the faculty apply the language to individual students.ā
āDean Mitchellās unguarded comments prove that Washington State has not learned its lesson,ā declared Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās French. āAfter swearing that the College of Education would not use political beliefs as a litmus test for future teachers, she admitted that she had done nothing to make sure that her students would not face these arbitrary and unconstitutional ideological tests.ā
The Passion of Mob Censorship
Washington Stateās actions against Ed Swan follow its attack on the rights of student playwright Chris Lee, who produced a controversial play entitled Passion of the Musical. Leeās intentionally offensive play was meant to, in his words, āshow people weāre not that different, we all have issues that can be made fun of.ā Although he is African American himself and the play poked fun at virtually every imaginable group, Lee was accused of racism, and his play was disrupted several times by hecklers, some of whom violently threatened the actors.
Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS soon discovered that Washington State administrators had bought tickets for hecklers to attend his play, and later uncovered the fact that administrators had furthermore organized the protest, encouraging students to stand up and say āIām offendedā every time Leeās play rankled them. The students did that and much more, severely disrupting Leeās play and trampling his First Amendment rights. After Washington State President V. Lane Rawlins repeatedly refused to admit any wrongdoing, Vice President Michael Tate asked Lee to write a letter indicating what he hoped the university would do. Lee did so, emphasizing that he intends to produce other plays and is afraid his rights will not be protected. However, Tateās response repeated the universityās incorrect claim that heckling is free speech, too.
āIt is ridiculous to assert that shouting down a play enjoys the same level of constitutional protection as the play itself,ā noted Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS Director of Legal and Public Advocacy Greg Lukianoff. āUniversities have a responsibility to stop disruptive hecklers, not aid and abet them. Washington Stateās utter disregard for Chris Leeās rights is indefensible.ā
āChris Lee plans to put on more plays this fall,ā Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās French concluded. āĀé¶¹“«Ć½IOS will continue to fight these abuses until Washington State acknowledges its obligation to make sure Chris Leeās plays are not disrupted again, and until its College of Education actually dismantles its edifice of ideological discrimination.ā
Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience at our nationās colleges and universities. Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās efforts to preserve liberty at Washington State University can be viewed at thefire.org/wsu.
CONTACT:
David French, President, Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS: 215-717-3473; david@thefire.org
Greg Lukianoff, Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS: 215-717-3473; greg@thefire.org
V. Lane Rawlins, President, Washington State University: 509-335-6666; rawlins@wsu.edu
Judy Mitchell, Dean, College of Education, Washington State University: 509-335-1738; judym@wsu.edu
Recent Articles
Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Federal court backs teachers fired over trans protest

Speak up, get expelled: the Eastman way

University of Rochester student expelled after detailing school's mishandling of harassment complaint on Substack
