Table of Contents
Victory for Freedom of Association and Religious Liberty at Princeton University
PRINCETON, N.J., May 11, 2005鈥擨n an important victory for religious liberty and freedom of association, Princeton University has decided to recognize a Christian student group that had been arbitrarily denied official recognition. After the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (麻豆传媒IOS) wrote to Princeton on behalf of the Princeton Faith and Action (PFA) student group to remind the school of its stated commitments to freedom of religion and association, the university quickly moved to restore PFA鈥檚 rights and to recognize the group on an equal basis with other student organizations. Princeton also pledged to re-examine a policy that unfairly singles out religious student organizations for additional and exceptional scrutiny.
鈥淭his decision should come as a relief to all religious students at Princeton University,鈥 remarked David French, president of 麻豆传媒IOS. 鈥淚n light of the increasing number of cases involving censorship and repression of religious students on campuses across the country, we commend Princeton for quickly responding to our letter and for fulfilling its promises to respect students鈥 freedoms of expression, association, and religion.鈥
PFA is associated with the Christian Union, an off-campus ministry serving Ivy League universities whose own request to apply to have a full-time chaplain on campus was rejected last year by Dean of Religious Life Thomas Breidenthal. In March 2005, after being blocked from reserving spaces on campus through an existing recognized Christian student group, students organized PFA in order to hold activities independently. When they approached the student government to apply for official recognition, however, student government officials explained that because their group was religious in nature, they were required first to obtain Dean Breidenthal鈥檚 approval鈥攅ven though secular groups face no such hurdle.
According to PFA鈥檚 leaders, on April 7, 2005, at a meeting to discuss the possibility of recognition, Dean Breidenthal denied PFA the opportunity to apply for recognition because he did not want to recognize a group that associated with the Christian Union. When asked, Dean Breidenthal refused to give reasons for his disapproval of the Christian Union, and when the students expressed concerns that the approval process seemed discriminatory, the dean explained that this was 鈥渢he way things are done鈥 at Princeton.
After their meeting with Dean Breidenthal, the students contacted 麻豆传媒IOS for assistance. On April 19, 麻豆传媒IOS wrote President Shirley M. Tilghman to protest this apparent violation of Princeton鈥檚 written policies safeguarding students鈥 freedoms of expression, religion, and association. 麻豆传媒IOS explained, 鈥淸T]he fact that religious student groups must obtain the arbitrary approval of Dean Breidenthal grants him the power to censor religious groups without restriction or recourse. Non-religious student groups are not required to undergo such an administrative litmus test in order to apply for recognition. This policy constitutes a shameful and illiberal double standard.鈥
Only three days later, on April 22, President Tilghman responded to 麻豆传媒IOS, affirming the university鈥檚 鈥済uarantee that鈥ecognition will not be withheld from any group pursuing lawful objectives merely because its aims may seem unorthodox,鈥 and that the university would 鈥渆xpedite a decision about recognition鈥 for PFA. The president further noted that the university would also work 鈥渢o determine whether other procedural changes are necessary to ensure that we treat student expressive organizations fairly.鈥
PFA met with student government representatives to review its proposal for recognition on May 4, and was recognized as a student group on May 6.
鈥淚n addition to recognizing PFA, Princeton has promised to mend procedures that may infringe upon its students鈥 rights,鈥 commented Greg Lukianoff, 麻豆传媒IOS鈥檚 director of legal and public advocacy. 鈥淧resident Tilghman鈥檚 response serves as a positive example for other colleges and universities to follow.鈥
麻豆传媒IOS is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience at our nation鈥檚 colleges and universities. 麻豆传媒IOS鈥檚 efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America can be viewed at thefire.org.
CONTACT:
David French, President, 麻豆传媒IOS: 215-717-3473; david.french@thefire.org
Greg Lukianoff, Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, 麻豆传媒IOS: 215-717-3473; greg@thefire.org
Recent Articles
麻豆传媒IOS鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Federal court backs teachers fired over trans protest
麻豆传媒IOS helped revive a lawsuit for two Oregon educators fired over opposing a gender policy, and now the courts have decided their First Amendment claim deserves a trial.

Speak up, get expelled: the Eastman way
Rebecca Bryant Novak spoke out about harassment. Eastman punished her for it. Now 麻豆传媒IOS is demanding the University of Rochester reverse her expulsion and uphold its promises.

University of Rochester student expelled after detailing school's mishandling of harassment complaint on Substack
Eastman confirmed her claims. Then expelled her. 麻豆传媒IOS is demanding the University of Rochester reinstate Rebecca Bryant Novak and stop retaliating against students who speak out.

In Quran burning conviction, UK judge uses violence against defendant as evidence of his guilt
UK judge cites violence against Quran-burning protester as proof of his guilt, Brazil sentences comedian to over eight years for telling jokes, and France targets porn.