�鶹��ýIOS

Earlier this week, Stanford University  an instructor while the institution investigates allegations Jewish and Israeli students were targeted for discriminatory treatment in a required, first-year “” course. Discriminating against students based on a protected characteristic such as race, gender, or national origin, violates . 

Academic freedom protects an exceptionally wide range of pedagogically relevant classroom speech by faculty. But the alleged conduct in this case, taken together, appears to cross the line. According to   , in impromptu discussions of the Israeli war with Hamas during two classes, the instructor allegedly:

• asked Jewish and Israeli students to raise their hands;
• separated the Jewish and Israeli students from their peers, who he said represented the “colonized,” by ordering the Jewish and Israeli students to stand in the corner; 
• labeled the Jewish and Israeli students “colonizers;” and
• argued that Israel is a colonizer that has killed more people than were killed during the Holocaust.
• There are also   about how the instructor may have taken, or otherwise separated, one or more students from their belongings before they were sent to the corner.

Academic freedom protects instructors’ rights to make the argument that Israel is a colonizer responsible for many deaths, just as it protects all other arguments germane to the subject of a course. But academic freedom does not allow the singling out of students for adverse treatment on the basis of protected class status. �鶹��ýIOS has long argued that while “airing a view is not the same thing as acting on it,” universities must act to prohibit discriminatory conduct by faculty.

Like any other instructor facing misconduct allegations, Stanford must provide the instructor robust due process protections to ensure basic fairness in any disciplinary proceeding. 

As this situation unfolds, �鶹��ýIOS will watch closely.