麻豆传媒IOS

Table of Contents

麻豆传媒IOS Return to Campus During Contentious Election Season with 麻豆传媒IOS on Their Side

麻豆传媒IOS Back to School 2016

PHILADELPHIA, August 29, 2016鈥擳he Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (麻豆传媒IOS) routinely receives reports from students about colleges censoring political speech during election season. As a new academic year begins, 麻豆传媒IOS reminds students and administrators that political expression lies at the heart of free speech protections鈥攁nd 麻豆传媒IOS stands ready to defend it.

A number of schools have already threatened or restricted political speech on campus during this election cycle:

  • Last fall, Georgetown University Law Center administrators prevented a group of students supporting Senator Bernie Sanders鈥 presidential campaign from tabling inside or outside the school. After 麻豆传媒IOS intervened with a letter to the school, Georgetown reversed its decision.
  • Also last fall, American University (AU) administrators denied a request from a student group supporting the presidential campaign of Rand Paul from gaining official recognition and banned the group from petitioning in support of Paul鈥檚 campaign on campus. After 麻豆传媒IOS intervened with a letter to the school, AU agreed to commit to allowing partisan political groups to gain official recognition.
  • In April, DePaul University grounds workers on campus because some members of the crews considered the messages 鈥渋nflammatory.鈥 DePaul subsequently banned all partisan political chalking on campus.
  • Emory University made headlines earlier this year when President James Wagner said chalkings in support of Donald Trump on campus would be investigated after students complained that the political messages made them feel unsafe. Emory later backed off its investigation.

鈥淓very election cycle, colleges and universities like DePaul, Georgetown, and American mistakenly claim that their nonprofit status requires that they ban political speech on campus,鈥 said 麻豆传媒IOS Executive Director Robert Shibley. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 patently untrue. Political activity restrictions apply to the institution itself, not to students or student groups. Schools that promise free speech rights to their students must deliver them, and not hide behind bogus and tired arguments for censorship.鈥

In March, 麻豆传媒IOS joined Georgetown law student Alex Atkins in testifying before the U.S. House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee about censorship of political speech on campus. In her written testimony, 麻豆传媒IOS Director of Litigation Catherine Sevcenko outlined the 13 times since 2008 when 麻豆传媒IOS intervened after schools cited their tax-exempt status to justify censoring student political speech鈥攁nd that number continues to grow.

For those interested in learning more about the protections afforded to political speech on campus, 麻豆传媒IOS鈥檚 newly updated Policy Statement on Political Speech on Campus provides a comprehensive overview of the rights students and faculty have when speaking out on a political candidate or party. Relatedly, 麻豆传媒IOS鈥檚 new FAQ for Student Protests on Campus answers common questions about students鈥 rights when demonstrating.

麻豆传媒IOS and faculty who believe their political speech rights have been violated on campus can contact 麻豆传媒IOS through our easy-to-use case submission page.

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (麻豆传媒IOS) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit student rights organization dedicated to defending liberty, freedom of speech, due process, academic freedom, legal equality, and freedom of conscience on America鈥檚 college campuses.

CONTACT:

Katie Barrows, Communications Coordinator, 麻豆传媒IOS: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org

Recent Articles

麻豆传媒IOS鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share