�鶹��ýIOS

New surveys on campus free expression are coming out seemingly everyday. Just in the last month, the following surveys have been released:

• �鶹��ýIOS’s own survey, conducted by and released yesterday, analyzing the attitudes of college students toward self-expression and censorship, students’ reactions to the speech of their peers, guest speakers, and disinvitations, and how students identify and perceive of hate speech.
• A surveying college students on their views toward the legality of free expression by UCLA professor John Villasenor, a nonresident senior fellow at the . This project has been by and the .
• The released a on free expression and due process.
• Just this week, the at Yale University released a new of college students’ attitudes toward free expression, including their views of hate speech. This follows the Buckley Program’s , , and surveys, also on campus expression.
• Finally, the will soon release a report on adults’ .

This is not a new area of research — survey data on Americans’ attitudes toward free expression has been systematically collected , and various researchers have analyzed the views of college freshmen . But it can be difficult to sort through all the data, especially because each study samples different populations, uses different methodologies for collecting and analyzing data, and asks respondents different questions.

We provided a cursory review of these reports in our survey's FAQ, but the following discussion is a more in-depth look at various public surveys on free speech and expression. What follows is not a comprehensive literature review — we include very few academic publications, which are often barred by a paywall — so all of our readers can easily access the resources we link to. But right here is good place to start for those interested in public opinion on campus expression.

General surveys on free expression

If you want to learn more generally about the state of expression on American college campuses, we recommend starting with , a published by the in 2016 based on data collected by , and our recent survey. �鶹��ýIOS’ views toward free expression and censorship are also discussed in a from the and in the 2011 book “,” a follow-up to a 1976 publication, “.”

Cross-temporal data

Cross-temporal replication — or asking the same questions of the same population multiple times over a period of years — is something that is extremely important to social scientific research.

If you are interested in finding out how attitudes toward free speech have changed over time, we recommend starting with the “” reports, which have been published since 1966 and ask college freshmen the same questions about free expression every few years.

The adult American population has also been surveyed on their views toward free expression since the 1970s by the , and for the past twenty years, the has released “” reports on Americans’ knowledge of their constitutional rights.

Cross-temporal data doesn’t stop there — the has asked high school students what they think about expression and the media since .

International data

Another interesting comparison is how Americans’ views toward free expression differ from the views of people in countries around the world.

The released a 2015 showing that people in the United States are more likely than people in other countries to support individual liberties, but that free expression is a globally supported value.

Earlier this year, the released a on the values held by young people across the world. They found that, on the global level, young people are split in their support for regulating offensive speech, with 51 percent believing that people should not have the right to say offensive comments to members of minority groups.

Guest speakers and disinvitations

Our survey is the first to comprehensively delve into students’ attitudes toward guest speakers and disinvitations, but other surveys have asked questions about guest speakers.

In 1966, asked administrators what they thought about controversial speakers. at the University of Pennsylvania recently followed up on this with a delving into administrators’ views toward security concerns and guest speakers on campus.

The asked the public what they thought about disinvitations in their 2014 “,” and in 2015 it was that 43 percent of American freshmen agreed that colleges have the right to ban extreme speakers from campus.

In 2017, the asked a similar question of American adults and that 43 percent of adults also think colleges should ban controversial speakers from campus.

As mentioned above, a from John Villasenor looks at student attitudes toward the legality of disinvitations, but does not ask them about their personal attitudes toward guest speakers.

Soon to be released from the is a including findings on adults’ attitudes toward the disinvitation of speakers from college campuses.

Hate speech and racist speech

Our survey also includes the most comprehensive analysis of students’ opinions on hate speech to date. We were inspired to include a series of open-ended questions about hate speech in our survey after reading and writing about Andrew Sellar’s about academic definitions of hate speech. The section of our report regarding how students define hate speech helps us understand what students mean when they report that they don’t support First Amendment protections for hate speech.

Earlier this year, the and partisan differences in views toward racist speech, which mirror findings both in our report and John Villasenor’s .

The just released new about students’ attitudes toward hate speech this week.

Thank you

�鶹��ýIOS is thankful for the public’s interest in our groundbreaking, comprehensive survey. We hope you find these resources useful as you learn more about attitudes toward free expression.