�鶹��ýIOS

On November 3, 2006, �鶹��ýIOS sent a follow-up letter to Gettysburg College in Pennsylvania encouraging the school to keep its promise to rewrite its Sexual Misconduct Policy as stated in a mass e-mail sent to the student body on October 29, 2006. �鶹��ýIOS pointed out that the primary problem with the policy was its extraordinary overbreadth, noting that “[t]he current policy makes almost every member of the campus community a sexual offender…(it) places acts of true sexual assault in the same group as innocuous everyday acts, such as hugs without permission.”

 

The exact wording of the offending part of the policy is this: 

That’s right—“continuing and active consent”—whatever that means. The policy further defines “sexual interaction” as “brushing, touching, grabbing, pinching, patting, hugging, and kissing.” In other words, by the very terms of the policy, husbands would have to ask permission to kiss their wives, boyfriends would have to ask permission to hug their girlfriends, and friends would have to ask permission to give an amiable pat on the back. And remember, failure to do so was deemed to be a form of “sexual assault.”

 

�鶹��ýIOS first wrote to Gettysburg on April 11, 2006, objecting to the policy, which “dangerously trivializes sexual assault by equating heinous acts with innocent behaviors.” Unfortunately, Gettysburg president Katherine Haley chose to defend the policy in a letter to �鶹��ýIOS on April 27, 2006, arguing that somehow it “reflect(ed) good practice.” Only after �鶹��ýIOS issued a press release on May 11, 2006, exposing the absurdity of Gettysburg’s policy to the public, and after writing another letter to the school on August 17, did Gettysburg state that it would be revisiting the policy this year—proving once again that “sunlight is the best disinfectant.”