Table of Contents
'The Michigan Review' Highlights U of M's Red-Light Speech Codes

(Steve Pepple / Shutterstock.com)
University of Michigan weakened due process by removing direct cross-examination and hiding much of the appeals process from public scrutiny.
In an for The Michigan Review, a student newspaper at the University of Michigan (U-M), Joss van Seventer explains how the school's red-light "Bias and Hate Speech" policy contradicts the university's rich history of free speech, from the "turbulent protests of the 60s" to U-M's "modern-day reputation as a leading center of research and inquiry." The article quotes Will on this point:
"It may be well-intentioned, but the University of Michigan's Bias and Hate Speech policy infringes on students' First Amendment rights," Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS's Director of Legal and Public Advocacy Will Creeley said. "In the rough-and-tumble environment of our liberal democracy, there is no right not to be offended." Creeley believes Michigan needs to seriously rethink its speech codes. "As a public university, Michigan is legally and morally obligated to allow its students all the rights provided by the First Amendment," Creeley said.
When van Seventer questioned him about the policy, U-M Associate General Counsel Jack Bernard responded that the code was both legal and necessary:
"As an educational institution with students from a wide range of countries and cultures, it's important for Michigan to have a framework that facilitates communication," Bernard said. Bernard further added that he did not believe there to be any conflict between the constitutionally-protected right to free speech and the University's policies. "The law certainly limits what policies the University can put in place, but it also gives us a measure of leeway, and we have definitely stayed within its boundaries," he said.
Bernard declines to explain how, exactly, a policy that prohibits a wide swath of protected speech "facilitates communication." His statement is also incorrect on the law: As a public university, U-M does not have "leeway" to substantively restrict free speech on campus, even hate speech. Bernard's defense of speech codes is truly unfortunate, because as Will points out, U-M would only need to make minor revisions to change its one red-light code to green:
"If the University would be willing to reconsider its Bias and Hate Speech policy, it could move from a red light school to a yellow or green light institution very easily," Creeley said.
Hopefully, van Seventer's article will help students and administrators alike recognize the need for speech code reform at U-M. Of course, Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS stands ready to help.
Recent Articles
Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Don’t let Texas criminalize free political speech in the name of AI regulation

Brendan Carr’s Bizarro World FCC

Day 100! Abridging the First Amendment: Zick releases major resource report on Trump’s executive orders — First Amendment News 468Â
