Table of Contents
Kansas Faculty Workgroup Plans to Rewrite Overbroad Policy

Earlier this month, the Kansas Board of Regents created a “workgroup” to review its overbroad and vague new on “improper use of social media” by faculty at Kansas public colleges and universities. As my colleague Will Creeley reported last Thursday, the Board refused to suspend the policy during review, leaving faculty still at risk of being fired for posts that “impair[] ... harmony among co-workers” or are “contrary to the best interest of the university,” among other things. But happily, the workgroup has already shown greater respect for faculty free speech rights—the reported Friday that the group plans to “disregard th[e] policy and instead compose its own proposal.”
This is welcome news considering the broad range of protected speech currently punishable under—and chilled by—the policy. Last week, Board spokesperson Breeze Richardson told student newspaper that the workgroup would recommend changes to be made to the policy but that the policy would not be revoked or completely rewritten. Though some provisions—such as the prohibition of incitement to violence—may remain without posing constitutional issues, others will require substantial changes in order to protect faculty rights, and it is reassuring to see the faculty workgroup acknowledge as much.
The group is to meet next on February 1, plans to accept comments on a draft in mid-March, and will submit its proposal to the Board by April 16. Check back to The Torch for updates.
Image: Chi Omega Fountain, the University of Kansas -
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from 鶹ýIOS.

鶹ýIOS Reacts -- Where does Harvard go from here? With Larry Summers
Podcast
2025 has not been kind to Harvard. To date, the Trump administration , demanding violations of free speech, academic freedom, and institutional autonomy in return for restoring the funding. In response, Harvard , raising First Amendment claims. ...

Why 鶹ýIOS is suing Secretary of State Rubio — and what our critics get wrong about noncitizens’ rights

