Table of Contents
Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS’s ‘Test for Free Speech’
In a on his blog Flow of Ideas, Colorado College President Dick Celeste writes of Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS:
An interesting note: In 2007, Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS reviewed 346 colleges and universities, and fully 96 percent of them did not pass its test for free speech (only 2% passed; 2% were unrated).
Celeste arrives at this figure by combining the number of schools that received either a "red light" or a "yellow light" rating in Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS's 2007 report Spotlight on Speech Codes 2007: The State of Free Speech on Our Nation's Campuses. By Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS's definition, "red light" schools maintain policies that both clearly and substantially restrict free speech; "yellow light" schools, by contrast, maintain policies that, while not necessarily facially unconstitutional, are ripe for abuse by administrations eager to censor protected speech―administrations like, say, the one at Colorado College! A good way to think of the distinction is that at red-light schools, free speech is explicitly restricted; at yellow-light schools, it is only threatened, but often seriously so.
So when referring to the percentage of schools that, in Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS's estimation, actively prohibit protected speech, the accurate figure to use is the percentage of red-light institutions: 75 percent.
Celeste's tone also clearly implies that he believes the high number of schools rated poorly for free speech has more to do with Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS's methods or judgment than with the simple fact that universities today are hotbeds of censorship. He suggests that the high number of poorly rated institutions somehow discredits Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS, rather than discrediting the institutions themselves. But Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS's "test" doesn't rely on some arbitrary appraisal of a policy; rather, we examine the policy in light of the clear jurisprudential standards established by the Supreme Court and the Department of Education. Besides, Celeste's implied aspersions are ironic, coming from a man whose own institution shamelessly censored students for engaging in protected satire, an act that would have been wholly unconstitutional at any of Colorado's public colleges or universities.
Finally, it is important to note that Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS has no "test for free speech" beyond the "test" laid out by the First Amendment, which requires that government institutions "shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech."
Given President Celeste's obvious disregard for free speech, it is no surprise that Colorado College both receives a red-light rating and is one of only five schools on Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS's Red Alert List.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS.

Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS Reacts -- Where does Harvard go from here? With Larry Summers
Podcast
2025 has not been kind to Harvard. To date, the Trump administration , demanding violations of free speech, academic freedom, and institutional autonomy in return for restoring the funding. In response, Harvard , raising First Amendment claims. ...

How America’s top tribal arts college silenced a student — and made him homeless

Why Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS is suing Secretary of State Rubio — and what our critics get wrong about noncitizens’ rights
