Table of Contents
Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās Shibley Notes Missing Voices in āNew York Timesā Article on āAffirmative Consentā

Earlier this week, Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās Robert Shibley wrote a letter to the public editor of The New York Times, Margaret Sullivan, in response to a Times article on Californiaās new law requiring college students to give and receive āaffirmative consentā for sex. Hereās Robertās in full:
Dear Ms. Sullivan:
Richard PĆ©rez-PeƱa and Ian Lovettās September 29, 2014, article, āCalifornia Law on Sexual Consent Pleases Many but Leaves Some Doubters,ā neglects to mention some of the most powerful arguments of the ādoubtersā and, we fear, leaves the reader with a false impression about the nature of worries about the new law. Specifically, civil libertarians have voiced doubts about whether a law of this nature can be fairly administered, especially given the nature of human sexuality as a lived experience.
Media outlets including , , the , the , and have all cited civil liberties and/or due process concerns about the bill. Yet the Timesā article makes no mention of these concerns, focusing instead on critics who simply doubt the lawās potential effectiveness in reducing the incidence of campus rape. This is a startling oversight, made all the more baffling by the fact that so many other major publications have addressed the lawās potential to cause real confusion when it comes time to determine whether a sexual act was or was not consensual.
This problem is far from merely theoretical. As reported recently, increasing numbers of students across the country have filed lawsuits against their colleges claiming that they were wrongly found guilty of sexual assault. Passage of a law that further muddies the waters when it comes to due process and fair administrationāone of the lawās authors responded to a question about how an innocent party could prove that he or she got consent by saying āāāwill only make the problem worse.
By making no mention of the severe problems with this bill from a civil liberties perspective, the Times has done its readers a disservice.
Sincerely,
Robert Shibley
For more analysis of Californiaās new law, check out Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās past coverage here on The Torch.
Recent Articles
Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Donāt let Texas criminalize free political speech in the name of AI regulation

Brendan Carrās Bizarro World FCC

Day 100! Abridging the First Amendment: Zick releases major resource report on Trumpās executive orders ā First Amendment News 468Ā
