Table of Contents
Ā鶹“«Ć½IOSās Creeley on ReasonTV: Why Banning āHate Speechā Doesnāt Work
Earlier this month, we brought news that University of California (UC) System President Mark Yudof had received a recommendation to implement a "hate speech" policy from a working group comprised of members of UC's . The recommendation asks Yudof to implement policies that fundamentally violate students' expressive rightsāincluding an outright ban on "hate speech." The advisory council even states that UC should "accept the challenge" of First Amendment litigation.
Ā鶹“«Ć½IOS has to reject that recommendation, and we're cautiously optimistic about his response. To make our point even clearer, Ā鶹“«Ć½IOS Director of Legal and Public Advocacy Will Creeley recently .
What more is there to say? Will covers all the bases. Banning hate speech disempowers the very groups the rules are meant to protect, and silencing ābadā speech furthers fear and hatred. The only way to really fight unfavorable speech is with more speech.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from Ā鶹“«Ć½IOS.
Ā鶹“«Ć½IOS Reacts -- Where does Harvard go from here? With Larry Summers
Podcast
2025 has not been kind to Harvard. To date, the Trump administration , demanding violations of free speech, academic freedom, and institutional autonomy in return for restoring the funding. In response, Harvard , raising First Amendment claims. ...
How Americaās top tribal arts college silenced a student ā and made him homeless
Why Ā鶹“«Ć½IOS is suing Secretary of State Rubio ā and what our critics get wrong about noncitizensā rights
