Table of Contents
Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS statement on ruling that Trump’s funding freeze for Harvard was unlawful
f11photo/Shutterstock.com
Today, a federal court what Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS has said all along: The Trump administration trampled Harvard University’s First Amendment rights and broke civil rights law when it yanked billions in federal grants and contracts over alleged Title VI violations.
The worthy goal of combating unlawful anti-Semitic discrimination on campus cannot justify the flatly unlawful and unconstitutional means used by the Trump administration in this attempted hostile takeover, including demanding that Harvard impose ideological litmus tests and restrictive speech codes. Our government may not use civil rights laws as a pretext to violate the First Amendment.
Read Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS’s amicus brief here.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS.
Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS answers your questions
Podcast
Texas runs afoul of the First Amendment with new limits on faculty course materials
Free speech advocates rally to support Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS’s defense of First Amendment protections for drag shows