Table of Contents
Department of Justice files Statement of Interest in Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās Brown v. JCJC, compares campus rules to Orwellās āNineteen Eighty-Fourā

(Christopher E Zimmer/Shutterstock)
Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a in a lawsuit filed in September by Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS against Mississippiās Jones County Junior College as part of Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās . The DOJās statement, accompanied by a , forcefully argues that āpublic colleges cannot trample on their studentsā First Amendment rights to free speech.ā
Our lawsuit raises a First Amendment challenge to the collegeās policies requiring administrative approval, at least three days in advance, for all āmeetings or gatheringsā on campus and giving administrators discretion over whether to schedule an event. Plaintiff and former student Mike Brown alleges that he was stopped by campus police twice for attempting to speak with fellow students about free speech and civil liberties issues without the collegeās permission.
āSuch extreme preconditions to speech might not be out of place in Oceania, the fictional dystopian superstate in George Orwellās Nineteen Eighty-Four,ā the DOJ wrote in its statement. āThe First Amendment to the United States Constitution, however, ensures that preconditions like these have no place in the United States of America.ā
The statement argues that Jones Collegeās speech codes are constitutionally unsound for several reasons:
JCJCās speech policies do not pass First Amendment muster in at least two major respects: they operate as a prior restraint on all student speech and contain no exception for individuals or small groups; and they further grant school officials unbridled discretion to determine which students may speak, and about what they might speak.
The DOJ took no position on a pending motion to dismiss filed by defendants in October, which argues that plaintiffs lack standing to pursue their claims and that certain defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. Rather, the Department notes that defendants ātellingly make no effort to reconcile JCJCās speech policies with the First Amendment,ā and argues that āregardless of whether this particular case may proceed, JCJC, as a public institution of higher education, has a freestanding obligation to comply with the First Amendment.ā To that end, the DOJ gives the college some pointed advice:
As a public institution of higher education, JCJC should be encouraging speech, not stifling it. Its unconstitutional conduct cannot stand. JCJC need notāand should notāwait for a court with jurisdiction to steamroll it into compliance. It should comply voluntarily with the First Amendmentāand soon.
The DOJ statement comes only a week after Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS announced that Jackson State University eliminated or revised all of its speech policies that conflicted with the First Amendment, becoming the sixth institution in Mississippi to earn the highest, āgreen lightā rating from Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS. With that, Mississippi became the second state, after Arizona, to have all of its rated universities earn a green light rating.
Yesterday, the nationās highest law enforcement agency made clear its view that Jones College should stop bucking this statewide trend and act to uphold its studentsā First Amendment rights.
Recent Articles
Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Brendan Carrās Bizarro World FCC

Day 100! Abridging the First Amendment: Zick releases major resource report on Trumpās executive orders ā First Amendment News 468Ā

Detaining Ćztürk over an op-ed is unlawful and un-American
