Table of Contents
Columbia caves to feds — and sets a dangerous precedent

Here Now / Shutterstock.com
Pro-Palestinian protesters on the Columbia University campus on Jan. 19, 2024.
Today Columbia University announced policies to address government demands after the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the U.S. General Services Administration canceled $400 million in federal grants and contracts, alleging an anti-Semitic hostile environment at the school. The following statement can be attributed to Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS Lead Counsel Tyler Coward.
The federal government abandoned its existing process to brow-beat Columbia — and Columbia folded.
Higher education reform shouldn’t resemble a shakedown. Colleges and universities shouldn’t be bullied into accepting speech-restrictive demands because the government dangles a $400 million check over an institution’s head. Any changes made as a result of this flawed process are inherently suspect.
Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS is looking into the steps Columbia in response to government demands, and their implications for free speech and academic freedom. But one stands out instantly: Columbia crafted its own of anti-Semitism that is vague and sweeping enough that it will imperil speech otherwise protected by the First Amendment.
The federal government shouldn’t pressure any college, private or public, to censor speech critical of any country.
Shaking under government pressure, Columbia crumbled. If Columbia — with its immense resources and influence — can’t stand up to government demands that threaten free speech, what are other colleges to do?
Behavior that gets rewarded gets repeated. Free speech and academic freedom are worth fighting for. Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS will stand with any institution willing to stand up for itself.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS.

Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS Reacts -- Where does Harvard go from here? With Larry Summers
Podcast
2025 has not been kind to Harvard. To date, the Trump administration , demanding violations of free speech, academic freedom, and institutional autonomy in return for restoring the funding. In response, Harvard , raising First Amendment claims. ...

Why Âé¶¹´«Ã½IOS is suing Secretary of State Rubio — and what our critics get wrong about noncitizens’ rights

