Table of Contents
Campus free speech orgs seek to intervene in lawsuit to defend new Title IX regulations

WASHINGTON, June 24, 2020 ā Today, a coalition of organizations that support free speech on campus filed a petition in federal court asking to participate in litigation surrounding the Department of Educationās new .
The petition from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, , and seeks to defend the free speech protections established by the department against a lawsuit filed by the ACLU. , if successful, would stop the protections from going into effect.
Specifically, Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS, Speech First, and Independent Womenās Law Center are asking the courtās permission to āinterveneā in the lawsuit in order to argue that the Department of Educationās definition of peer-on-peer harassment is not only permissible but required by the First Amendment.
The departmentās definition of harassment comes from the 1999 Supreme Court case Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education. In the case, actionable sexual harassment was defined as conduct āso severe, pervasive, and objectively offensiveā that it effectively denies a person equal access to education. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Sandra Day OāConnor and joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg, John Paul Stevens, David Souter, and Stephen Breyer, emphasized that schools must take care not to āover-complyā with Title IX by censoring protected speech.
Over the years, campus authorities have employed unconstitutional harassment policies that are inconsistent with Davis to stifle expression and punish students and faculty members. While the ACLUās lawsuit argues that the new Title IX regulationsā use of the Davis standard is discriminatory toward women, the coalition argues that the Department of Education was required to adopt the Davis standard in order to ensure that college harassment policies are in line with the First Amendment.
āFor more than a generation, colleges have used bogus sexual harassment definitions and transparent double standards to punish students and faculty for expression that is protected by law and often not even that controversial off campus,ā said Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS Executive Director Robert Shibley. āBy incorporating the Supreme Courtās definition of sexual harassment and finally complying with the First Amendment, the new Title IX regulations seek to end this abuse. This change should be cheered, not challenged, by civil liberties organizations.ā
āFor far too long, universities made a conscious decision to sacrifice the First Amendment on the altar of Title IX,ā said Speech First President Nicole Neily. āAcross the country, our student membersā speech rights have been chilled by overbroad harassment policies that were encouraged by the previous administrationās overreach. The Davis standard is not only the appropriate standard for campus speech ā it is the constitutionally required one.ā
Jennifer C. Braceras, director of Independent Womenās Law Center said, āSchools may not violate the First Amendment rights of faculty and students on the ground that certain speech offends the sensibilities of certain women on campus. The departmentās new rule is not only good policy, it is compelled by law.ā
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is a nonpartisan, nonprofit student rights organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at Americaās colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience ā the essential qualities of liberty.
is the leading national womenās organization dedicated to developing and advancing policies that arenāt just well-intended, but actually enhance peopleās freedom, opportunities, and well-being. IWF oversees the Independent Womenās Law Center, which advocates for equal opportunity, individual liberty, and respect for the American constitutional order.
is a nationwide membership organization of students, alumni, and other concerned citizens; the organization is dedicated to preserving civil rights secured by law, including the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment.
CONTACT:
Daniel Burnett, Assistant Director of Communications, Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOS: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org
Elizabeth Tew, Communications Manager, Independent Womenās Forum: 910-988-0726; elizabeth.tew@iwf.org
John Gage, Speech First Account Executive, CRC Advisors: 402-730-2637; jgage@crcadvisors.com
- Due Process
- Harassment
- Student Rights
- Title IX
- Campus Free Speech Statute
- U.S. Department of Education enacts new Title IX regulations requiring procedural safeguards in campus disciplinary hearings, adopts Supreme Court sexual harassment definition
- Departments of Education and Justice: National "Blueprint" for Unconstitutional Speech Codes
- Know Your IX et al. v. DeVos
Recent Articles
Āé¶¹“«Ć½IOSās award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Detaining Ćztürk over an op-ed is unlawful and un-American

Day 100! Abridging the First Amendment: Zick releases major resource report on Trumpās executive orders ā First Amendment News 468Ā

VICTORY! Tenn. town buries unconstitutional ordinance used to punish holiday skeleton display
