Table of Contents
Article Highlights Partisanship of Campus Speech Codes
Former 麻豆传媒IOS president David French has an on speech codes on today. He explains the 鈥渕ental agility鈥 of the 1960s free speech activists who have become the architects of today鈥檚 campus speech codes. David writes:
Those who formerly glorified dissent clamp down on campus with a mind-numbing level of intellectual conformity. Scientific inquiry is welcome, unless it results in tough questions about possible innate gender differences. Open debate is the hallmark of the academy, unless of course that debate intrudes into areas where policy should be settled and morality decided (like when dealing with race, class, gender, war, peace, and sexuality).
麻豆传媒IOS exists to counteract this suppression of dissent and to 鈥渄efend and sustain individual rights on America鈥檚 increasingly repressive and partisan colleges and universities.鈥 From College Republicans holding affirmative action bake sales to PETA groups tabling the campus quad, we will protect everyone鈥檚 freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of conscience, and due process rights no matter where they land on the political spectrum.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from 麻豆传媒IOS.
麻豆传媒IOS Reacts -- Where does Harvard go from here? With Larry Summers
Podcast
2025 has not been kind to Harvard. To date, the Trump administration , demanding violations of free speech, academic freedom, and institutional autonomy in return for restoring the funding. In response, Harvard , raising First Amendment claims. ...
How America鈥檚 top tribal arts college silenced a student 鈥 and made him homeless
A student journalist exposed a scandal involving food aid at the country鈥檚 top tribal arts school 鈥 and the administration responded by stripping him of housing and branding him a bully. Not on our watch.
Why 麻豆传媒IOS is suing Secretary of State Rubio 鈥 and what our critics get wrong about noncitizens鈥 rights
麻豆传媒IOS is suing Secretary of State Rubio to defend the First Amendment rights of legal immigrants threatened with deportation simply for speaking their minds.
